The Music Modernization Act, signed into law on October 11, 2018, is most widely discussed for what it did to mechanical royalty collection and the creation of the Mechanical Licensing Collective. But Title II of the same law, the Classics Protection and Access Act, addressed a gap in federal copyright law that had existed since the inception of recorded music and had left the earliest and most historically significant American recordings in a legally ambiguous position for decades.
The Gap That Existed Before 2018
Before the Music Modernization Act, sound recordings made before February 15, 1972 had no federal copyright protection. They existed only under a patchwork of state laws, which varied enormously in scope, duration, and enforcement mechanisms. A blues recording made in Chicago in 1948, a gospel recording made in Birmingham in 1953, a country recording made in Nashville in 1961: all of these existed in a legal grey zone where their rights holders had to pursue protection state by state rather than through unified federal statute.
This created practical problems. Small labels and family estates holding early recordings had no consistent national legal framework for licensing, enforcement, or establishing ownership. A digital streaming platform operating in multiple states faced different legal obligations in each jurisdiction. The result was that pre-1972 recordings were underserved by the streaming economy, underprotected against infringement, and undervalued in rights negotiations because the legal framework governing them was fragmented.
The Copyright Office's Music Modernization page provides the primary statutory documentation for Title II. The Wikipedia overview of the Music Modernization Act covers both the MLC provisions (Title I) and the Classics Protection provisions (Title II) in the legislative history context, including the congressional support that passed the bill without significant opposition.
What the Classics Protection and Access Act Actually Does
Title II creates a new federal protection system for pre-1972 sound recordings, but it is not a simple extension of standard copyright terms. The protection window operates on a tiered system based on the recording's publication date:
Recordings published before 1923 enter the public domain on the law's effective date. Recordings published between 1923 and 1946 receive 95 years of protection from publication. Recordings published between 1947 and 1956 receive 100 years of protection. Recordings published in 1957 or later and before February 15, 1972 receive 110 years of protection. The practical effect is that many early 1920s recordings are now in the public domain, while recordings from the 1940s through the 1960s have durable federal protection for decades to come.
For the blues, country, gospel, and R&B catalogs that From The Stem's community cares about most, this matters enormously. The recordings from the 1940s through the 1960s that form the foundation of American roots music, many of them made by Black artists who were exploited by early label practices and whose estates have historically had limited legal recourse, now have a federal framework that recognizes their rights and provides consistent protection across all fifty states.
The Royalty Entitlement for Streaming
Title II also created a royalty entitlement for pre-1972 recordings on digital streaming services. Before the law, streaming services were not required to pay performance royalties for pre-1972 recordings under federal law, though some were subject to state law obligations. The Classics Protection and Access Act brought pre-1972 recordings into the statutory framework for digital performance royalties, meaning rights holders of early recordings now receive royalties from services like Spotify, Apple Music, and SiriusXM under the same statutory rate structure as post-1972 recordings.
The Berklee Online's Music Modernization Act explainer covers the practical steps rights holders should take, including registering pre-1972 recordings with SoundExchange to ensure they are capturing digital performance royalties. Many small labels and family estates holding early recordings were not registered with SoundExchange before the law and may still be leaving digital royalties uncollected.
The Roots Music Community's Stake
From The Stem covers the intersection of music history and present-day artist economics, and the Classics Protection and Access Act sits precisely at that intersection. The early recordings in blues, country, and gospel that form the cultural foundation of everything the publication covers were, before 2018, legally orphaned from the federal framework that protects all more recent recordings.
Mollohan Production Inc. has a stake in how historical recording rights are understood and protected. Joshua has noted that the roots music community's relationship to its own history is complicated by the fact that so many foundational recordings were made under conditions of exploitation and with ownership structures that were often unfair to the original artists. Federal protection for those recordings does not undo historical injustice, but it does give surviving rights holders, including family estates, surviving artists, and small independent labels, a legal framework they previously lacked.
The royalty implications of mechanical rights reform at Royalty Exchange also touch on the pre-1972 space, since catalog value assessments now incorporate the Classics Protection provisions as a permanent feature of the legal landscape rather than an uncertain exception.
What Rights Holders Should Know Right Now
If you own or manage recordings made before February 15, 1972, several practical actions follow from the Classics Protection and Access Act. First, verify that your catalog is registered with SoundExchange for digital performance royalty collection. Uncollected royalties from the period since the law's effective date may be available for reclaim. Second, consult a music attorney about how the tiered protection windows affect the specific recordings in your catalog and what enforcement options are now available under federal law. Third, assess the fair market value of your catalog in light of the federal protection, which may have increased the catalog's licensing and sale value compared to assessments made before 2018.
The Berklee Online resource provides a practical starting checklist. The Copyright Office maintains the authoritative legislative text and supporting documents.
---
FAQ
Q: What was legally different about pre-1972 recordings before the Music Modernization Act? They had no federal copyright protection. Rights holders could only pursue protection under state laws, which varied by jurisdiction. This left them without consistent nationwide legal tools for licensing, enforcement, or royalty collection.
Q: What did the Classics Protection and Access Act change? It created federal copyright-style protections for pre-1972 sound recordings on a tiered system based on publication date, required digital streaming services to pay royalties for pre-1972 recordings, and gave rights holders a unified federal framework replacing the state-by-state patchwork.
Q: How long do the Classics Protection provisions last? It depends on when the recording was published. Recordings from 1923 to 1946 are protected for 95 years from publication; 1947 to 1956 receive 100 years; 1957 through February 1972 receive 110 years. See the Copyright Office Music Modernization page for full details.
Q: How do I collect digital performance royalties for pre-1972 recordings I own? Register the recordings with SoundExchange, which administers digital performance royalties for sound recordings. If your catalog was not registered before the Classics Protection provisions took effect, royalties from the effective date onward may be available through back payment processes.
Q: Why does this matter specifically for blues, country, and gospel catalogs? Because the most historically significant American recordings in these genres were made in the 1940s through the 1960s, a period that was entirely unprotected by federal law before 2018. Small labels and family estates holding these recordings now have federal legal tools they previously lacked, and streaming services are now required to compensate them for digital usage of these historically important works.
---
More from the Indie Label / Artist Dev desk
Honest, working reporting on the business of independent music from From The Stem.
Visit the Indie Label / Artist Dev vertical →